Evaluate both bob and pharma argument

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM131404744

Essay

Evaluate the widow's argument. Remember to discuss each element of the law. Include what you think will happen. Part II: Review the following hypothetical Pharma, Inc. manufactures herbal supplements. It created an herbal supplement called XLT to increase weight loss. Pharma complied with all FDA regulations.

In addition, Dr. Mitchell, a Pharma researcher, conducted a 6-month study of XLT. Dr. Mitchell's report stated that there were no side effects. Bob bought XLT directly from Pharma's website. He took double the recommended dosage for one week because he needed to lose weight fast; he had a 10-year high school reunion coming up. At the end of the week, Bob was hospitalized for abdominal pain. The hospital discovered that the XLT pills in Bob's possession contained a small amount of rat poison. Bob suffered injury from the poisoning, but eventually recovered.

Pharma investigated the claim and discovered that one batch of XLT was contaminated when Dr. Mitchell accidentally dropped rat poison into the process, and the inspector did not test that particular batch. Industry standards do not require inspections of every batch, only random inspections. This is the only instance of poisoning from the affected XLT batch. Bob sues Pharma for Product Liability based on Strict Liability. Evaluate both Bob's and Pharma's argument for each element of the law. Include the result that you think will happen.

Reference no: EM131404744

Questions Cloud

Which two departments should be converted to wireless first : What precautions should the school take to help recover the computers in the event they are lost or stolen?

Why would it be a good primary key : Design a table that tracks the selling transactions. What fields from the other two tables would need to be included in the "sales transaction" table? Justify your answer.

Explain which method is better for the company being discuss : Explain, with the help of an example, how a company could use a variable costing system, as well as an absorption costing system. Explain which method is better for the company being discussed.

Explain why reported correlation values should be supported : Explain why reported correlation values should be supported with either a scatterplot or a description of the scatterplot.

Evaluate both bob and pharma argument : This is the only instance of poisoning from the affected XLT batch. Bob sues Pharma for Product Liability based on Strict Liability. Evaluate both Bob's and Pharma's argument for each element of the law. Include the result that you think will happ..

Suggest variance measures identified company can employ : Suggest at least two variance measures the identified company can employ in a balanced scorecard performance evaluation system, and examine how the company can use these variances to improve performance.

Relationship between stopping distance and speed : In the relationship between these two variables, which is the response variable (y) and which is the explanatory variable (x)?

Who will be responsible for monitoring and editing the site : Who will be responsible for monitoring and editing the site? What types of content would you remove from the site?

Analyze main factors that an organization should consider : Analyze the main factors that an organization should consider in determining the required rate of return for evaluating projects in global markets and the impact that this will have on decision making.

Reviews

len1404744

2/23/2017 6:26:38 AM

Assignment Work with following details check and please reply asap. Part I: Essay #4 on page 162 Reference the law at issue. Evaluate the widow's argument. Remember to discuss each element of the law. Include what you think will happen. Part II: Review the following hypothetical Pharma, Inc. manufactures herbal supplements.

Write a Review

Message

User Account

All Pages