Ensure adequate supplier performance in the future

Assignment Help Operation Management
Reference no: EM131278242

The Alpha Omega Corporation The Alpha Omega Corporation, one of the world’s largest computer manufacturers, faced increasing challenges from a number of competitors for the market share needed for profitability and success. In recent years, the company had undertaken several efforts aimed at improving its profit margin and increasing sales. One such effort was the centralization of a group of talented procurement and component engineering personnel from around the country to one site. This new organization, known as CXO, had its humble beginnings in 1982 with a mere six procurement people and twenty component engineering personnel. Being the “darling” of the corporation, CXO added employees at a rate exceeding any other organization in the company; the head count now exceeds 150-20 of whom are employed in supply management functions. Within the supply management department of CXO, there are seven commodity managers, eight supply managers, and five support personnel. The organization has responsibility for the procurement of all integrated circuits used throughout the corporation as well as for negotiation of corporate pricing agreements in effect for most other repetitive purchases. The number of part numbers that CXO procures is approximately 2,000, of which all are received at CXO, tested, warehoused, and ultimately shipped to manufacturing plants worldwide. Other components used in Alpha Omega products are purchased and received directly by the system plants, against corporate pricing policy agreements negotiated by CXO. CXO procurement, in negotiating all pricing agreements, utilizes a materials requirements forecasting system created and installed by a team of in-house management system specialists at every manufacturing plant in the United States. This forecasting system collects data from each plant’s own master schedule system-extracting the data in such a way that when data from all plants are combined, the information is homogeneous. The data collected are the basis of the forecast for the next eighteen months. CXO buys against plant forecasts and requires its customers (the manufacturing plants) to place delivery orders against CXO contracts to cover the next five to nine weeks’ requirements. On an individual plant basis the orders seldom match the forecasts, which are obtained monthly and are probably outdated almost immediately; however, on an aggregate basis the total quantity ordered for any given part number roughly approximates the total forecast for all plants. CXO procurement negotiates future contracts with qualified suppliers using aggregate forecasts. Typically, an RFQ is sent out to all potential suppliers, many of whom respond with a bid. When the bids are received, supply management manually compiles the data in the first step of the award process. Second, supply management queries engineering and procurement personnel from all plants in an effort to obtain a service rating of the prospective suppliers. Test data likewise are collected from the test database and massaged to eliminate erroneous data. All this is a very time-consuming process and renders supply management almost incapable of processing any new purchase requisitions during the pre-award period. Eventually the contract is awarded to one or more suppliers based on several factors: qualification by engineering, price, past service, and quality ratings. Suppliers who have not yet been qualified are tentatively awarded a portion of the contract, but no deliveries will be requested or accepted until the supplier is qualified. Once the contract is awarded, supply management hopes that suppliers will perform up to the wording of the contract. Unfortunately, in spite of agreeing to make on-time deliveries of the right quantity and the right quality level, suppliers are often late or early, often deliver below what was ordered, and frequently ship parts that subsequently fail testing. 166 Guy Craig, commodity manager for memory and microprocessor devices, was quite concerned. His supply managers spent hundreds of hours determining which suppliers should be awarded contracts. In spite of this effort, the suppliers performed at an acceptable level only so far as price was concerned. Guy shared his dissatisfaction in quarterly reviews with the suppliers. He had nothing quantitative to back up his claims, with one exception: test histories were available, but were skewed on the negative side by lots purchased as “standard product” due to orders that were not forecasted. These parts were tested to Alpha Omega specifications and results had been erroneously counted against the supplier’s quality rating. (Normally when a supplier supplied to an Alpha Omega spec, it special-tested the parts in-house at the same parameters used by Alpha Omega.) Consequently, before test data could be shared with potential suppliers, manual manipulation of the data was required to properly document quality levels. The supply management database used by CXO contained all information pertinent to a purchase order and subsequent receipt of material. Guy, while not a computer whiz by any means, was knowledgeable enough to realize that with the help of management systems, he could obtain information on supplier performance by purchase order (i.e., on-time versus early or late delivery, and receipt in full versus partial receipt of the quantity ordered). The finance and materials departments both shared supply management’s concerns about supplier performance. Safety stock inventory levels had increased to guard against suppliers who did not deliver to contract. The desired inventory level was three weeks of material at an estimated cost of $3 million per week. CXO inventories had climbed to five weeks, clearly a detriment to a company with cash flow difficulties. The cost of this idle inventory was enormous; however, the potential costs associated with lower inventories (production disruptions and possible lost sales) were even greater. In recent supplier reviews, some of the suppliers expressed the idea that if parts were sampletested rather than 100 percent tested, the test cycle could be shortened, resulting in lower work in process inventory levels. The Alpha Omega quality department was not ready to go to sample testing except on parts that consistently achieved test failure rates of no more than 500 parts per million. The suppliers then suggested that if commercially standard products were specified, no additional testing should be required at either the supplier’s site or Alpha Omega’s. This would result in lower-cost purchased material and shorter lead times as well. Guy agreed with their ideas. He established an additional objective of obtaining engineering concurrence with the adoption of standard products in lieu of specially tested parts when possible. Engineering was less than enthusiastic about Guy’s involvement in “its area.” As Guy sat in a deserted building late one Friday evening, he looked at the list of objectives to be accomplished by CXO supply management this year. One jumped out at him: CXO had stated that it would save the corporation $10 million this year in favorable material price variance. Guy also knew that the corporation expected CXO to become 10 percent more productive this year. He felt that there was a significant amount of money to be saved throughout the organization if suppliers met their contractual obligations with regard to quality, quantity, timeliness, and service. His estimate was that 25 percent savings could be achieved if suppliers performed as stipulated. But how could be get there from here?

1. What is the basic reason that suppliers have consistently failed to meet their contractual obligations?

2. What can be done to ensure adequate supplier performance in the future?

3. On what basis should contracts be awarded?

Reference no: EM131278242

Questions Cloud

Assume the actual value and forecast value : Actual demands for the last four months are as follows. What are the forecast values for March, April, May, June and July based on exponential smoothing method with Alpha = 0.2? Assume the actual value and forecast value for March are the same.
What should we do to the forecast model : While monitoring the forecast values based on simple moving average method (averaging period = 5), the tracking signals are consistently coming out as large negative numbers (i.e., -14.0, -16.2, and -15.5). What should we do to the forecast model?
Three main modules that have individual reliabiliities : A computer has three main modules that have individual reliabiliities of .80,.90, and .90. Because of recent failures, management is now considering adding redundancy. Determine the reliability of the system with backups under these conditions: Each ..
Maintain its leadership in the video-game market : How would you use the adaptation model to advise Activision Blizzard on the best way to maintain its leadership in the video-game market?
Ensure adequate supplier performance in the future : The Alpha Omega Corporation The Alpha Omega Corporation, one of the world’s largest computer manufacturers, faced increasing challenges from a number of competitors for the market share needed for profitability and success. What is the basic reason t..
Arrival rate is poisson distributed : Gerry’s Gas Station has just one pump (and lots of waiting) in a very small town. During a normal day, customers arrive at Gerry’s on the average of 15 every two hours, while service takes just five minutes on the average. The arrival rate is Poisson..
What is the impact of facility decisions on a supply chain : Explain how relationship selling is related to the marketing concept. What is the difference between a distribution center and a warehouse? Describe why CRM is so important in managing supply chains. Use an example in your discussion. What is the imp..
Failure mode and effect analysis : The following problem deals with Total Quality Management, more specifically, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA): Construct a block diagram for a computer mouse. Upon completion of the block diagram, perform FMEA on the computer mouse. Start the..
Several companies use their brand as a competitive advantage : Several companies use their brand as a competitive advantage. Given your knowledge about the global economy, identify three brands you believe have the strongest likelihood of remaining a source of advantage in the 21st Century and explain why.

Reviews

Write a Review

 

Operation Management Questions & Answers

  Citing references to existing advertising campaigns

Take a position: TV advertising has faded in importance when compared to other advertising venues versus TV advertising is still the most powerful advertising medium. Regardless of your position, address whether your position this remains the same wh..

  Variety of training to the decision making process

Every suoervisor brings a unique personality, varied experiences and a variety of training to the decision making process. Some supervisors are risk takers some value certainty. others are logical and rational. All supervisors are called on to make d..

  Teddysports to maximize expected profit

Teddy Bower is an outdoor clothing and accessories chain that purchases a line of parkas at $10 each from its Asian supplier, TeddySports. Unfortunately, at the time of order placement, demand is still uncertain. How many parkas should Teddy Bower bu..

  Introducing total productive maintenance

Describe FIVE different improvements a manufacturing organization might experience as a result of introducing Total Productive Maintenance (TPM).

  Simply focusing on the intended performance of the product

Before you begin your analysis think of your most recent purchases. Were you swayed in any way by the design or looks of the product or were you simply focusing on the intended performance of the product? Now think about those marketers whose product..

  What is an affirmative defense and how does it differ

What is an affirmative defense and how does it differ from a negative defense? Why are they so important when drafting the Answer to a Complaint?

  How much fuel should u.s. express purchase

Draw the network diagram for this problem. implement the model for this problem in your spreadsheet, and solve it.

  Strategic planning-decision-making in complex environment

As the learning outcomes this week suggest, strategic planning in today’s ambiguous and turbulent environment is a challenge, what is your interpretation of the challenges and opportunities surrounding strategic planning and decision-making in a comp..

  Two firms face the same wage and rental price of capital

If two firms face the same wage and rental price of capital but spend different amounts labor and capital, how do their isocost lines differ? What is the effect on their isocost lines if the wage rate increases?

  What the best collaboration tools are for their needs

For firms that have multiple locations that would like their professionals from different teams to be able to collaborate efficiently, how would you determine what the best collaboration tools are for their needs?

  Outsourcing of various information systems functions

In this global age of information, suggest which threats are posed to the principles of confidentiality and privacy, related to offshore outsourcing of various information systems functions. Provide support for your rationale.

  Identify the reoder point in terms of the inventory position

Identify the reoder point in terms of the inventory position and in terms of the inventory on hard for each of the following lead times.

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd