Distinction between nature and custom

Assignment Help Other Subject
Reference no: EM13189976

Your essay assignment is to compare Democritus and the Sophists (Protagoras and Gorgias) on the distinction between nature and custom (or law). In Philosophy Before Socrates, McKirihan does not include Democritus in his discussion of this distinction [Chapter 20]. It is generally accepted that the Sophists introduced this distinction and did so as part of their activities as teachers of rhetoric in a new environment in which political power was much more democratic and traditional beliefs and morals were questioned and were changing. Thus the nature/custom distinction is usually associated entirely with the Sophists and with the 4th century responses to them by Plato and then by his student Aristotle. We will discuss those responses when the course turns to those authors, but you are now being asked to write not only on the Sophists but on Democritus as well with respect to nature and custom. Since McKirihan gives you no guidance in doing this for Democritus, and we had time only barely to touch upon the topic in our last class, I am writing this note to assist you.
The first thing to keep in mind is that these two terms, "nature" and "custom", are topics [?????]or places of discussion; i. e. they are given different meanings by different authors. Different meanings have different implications for what is considered a good life. All the philosophers cited in Chapter 20 are Sophists. They pretty much agree that truth is what wins the argument and is always subject to further argument and change. That's what it means to say that "man is the measure". This basic idea is familiar to you, in fact tends to dominate many minds, in the idea that truth is a matter of individual point of view. Another way of saying this is to say that there is no truth, only opinion. Sometimes it is suggested that we not try to impose our opinions on others, but this is naïve, not only because we need to choose in order to act (and life is action), but because every time we speak we assert a point of view ["assertion" is a synonym for "statement"]and at least implicitly try to persuade others of it. Moreover, we learn much in a good debate as assertions and counter-assertions lead to the discovery of more facts and more adequate interpretations. According to the Sophists, all this is a matter of rhetoric and persuasion; there is no independent, objective standard by which the views of persons can be measured.
This point against objectivity makes for a useful transition to Democritus. The atomistic philosophy is the very opposite of the sophistic and is as familiar to us as ideas about individual points of view. It is the idea of scientific objectivity. Democritus' claim is that by thinking about experience we can find the elements of all that exists and happens and get rid entirely of any subjectivity or personal point of view present in experiences before they have been analyzed. This is why he calls experience a bastard or illegitimate knowledge, contrasting it with the legitimate knowledge of atoms moving in the void. An atom is about as great a contrast as you can get with a personal point of view. It is stuff devoid of all quality except for shape and motion. As such, in itself it has nothing to do with perception or thought at all. Atoms are known by thought, but so far from having the quality of thought, thoughts are instead explained as motions of atoms: material events in the human nervous system (another familiar thought). 
Having briefly contrasted the two philosophies, I will write briefly about nature and custom in each.
In thinking about the Sophists' view, it is clear that "nature" cannot refer to the world around us, since on their view it is the product of our assertions, our words engaged in persuasive communication. In that respect, it is no different from the laws [custom, ?????]we formulate in our legislatures and cultural traditions. Paradoxically, what we usually call "nature", the natural world, is by custom or agreement among human beings - although that agreement is never unanimous. I illustrated this in class by reference to the persuasiveness of those who have convinced us that the earth is neither flat nor at rest, that the world is governed by laws of inertia and impressed mechanical forces, and then, changing their (and our) minds, that it is energy governed by quantum laws and the curvature of space, etc. What then is nature for the Sophist? It is the human nature that is the source of all custom, the desire to act that leads to the production of all our customs, i. e. of our beliefs about laws of nature as well as laws of behavior. Read McKirihan's long discussion of whether the good life consists in following nature or custom in terms of these distinctions.
For Democritus, however, nature is the world around us, and us too, as atoms moving in the void. We need customs to live together and opinions to act and survive as organisms in the world, but these customs are good only insofar as they are based on knowledge of nature: science is the source of wisdom. In place of the self-assertive ethic of the sophist, the atomist gives us the idea of health. The question in life is how to preserve oneself, i. e. one's nature (a configuration of atoms). Instead of the power of assertion of one's own desires, the atomist shows us the need to moderate desire by making one's nature stronger in the sense of less susceptible to the external causes that stimulate desire. Ethics and law are customs, but like science, they are good and true only when based on nature. The community exists by agreement, but its aims is self-preservation and self-determination.
I could say more on all of these topics. But my purpose is to give you some guidance, not to cover the subject. Use these notes to guide you in your interpretation of the Sophists and Atomists and of McKirihan's discussion in Chapter 20 of Nature and Custom. 

Reference no: EM13189976

Questions Cloud

Define what is mass aluminum sulfate : What mass of precipitate forms when 124.5 mL of 0.660 M NaOH is added to 517 mL of a solution that contains 10.9 g aluminum sulfate per liter?
What is the annual savings over the other design : Consider two possible designs for a product which are sold for $0.70 each. There are only two differences in the production of both designs: operation 1 and operation 2. The first product, A, requires 16 hours of operation 1 and 4.5 hours of opera..
What should be the price of the ticket if the game is fair : A lottery offers one $1000 prize, one $500 prize, five $100 prizes, and ten $10 prizes. One thousand tickets are sold. What should be the price of the ticket if the game is fair?
Translate the phrase to an algebraic expression : Justin had $33 before spending b dollars on jeans. How much money remains?
Distinction between nature and custom : Your essay assignment is to compare Democritus and the Sophists (Protagoras and Gorgias) on the distinction between nature and custom (or law). In Philosophy Before Socrates, McKirihan does not include Democritus in his discussion of this distinction..
Why might zenvox choose to produce at a price : The Zenvox TV Company faces a demand function for its products that can be expressed as Q = 4,000 - P + 0.5i, where Q is the number of tv's, P is the price per tv, and i is the average monthly income. Average monthly income is currently equal to $..
Explain how many grams of liquid sodium : How many grams of liquid sodium (minimum) are needed to absorb 4.70 MJ of energy (in the form of heat) if the temperature of the sodium is not to increase by more than 10.0 °C?
State the reaction of chlorine with sodium hydroxide : Think about the reaction of (a) chlorine with sodium hydroxide and the reaction of (b) acetone with hypochlorite ion. Classify Each reaction as either:
How many people are in the room : Two-thirds of the people in a room are seated in three-fourths of the chairs. The rest of the people are standing. If there are 6 empty chairs, how many people are in the room?

Reviews

Write a Review

 

Other Subject Questions & Answers

  Debate whether or not the current economic crisis

Debate whether or not the current economic crisis has had an impact on the HR profession as a whole. Be sure to include how you think the economic crisis has changed the way that HR professionals do their work and who specifically might be involved.

  More script for a health care professional

Prepare a 500 word or more "script" for a health care professional to use when explaining to the patient his condition and the proposed procedures

  Trait theories of leadership

Your company's HR director is a believer in trait theories of leadership. He believes that he can differentiate leaders from non-leaders by focusing on personal qualities and characteristics. The HR director plans to promote Lawrence, a highly extrov..

  Considering both geologic and human-induced factors

Considering both geologic and human-induced factors, would earthquakes of similar magnitudes in different regions of the Earth cause approximately the same levels of damage necessarily?

  Explain standard of indisputability-conclusive objection

McCloskey claims that to get the proof going, genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed. Explain this standard of indisputability which he calls very conclusive objection. Is it reasonable?

  Contraposing propositions

Contrapose the following propositions and state whether the converse is logically equivalent or not logically equivalent to original.

  Examine the influence that legal issues-ethics

Examine the influence that legal issues, ethics, and corporate social responsibility have had on management planning at chosen company. Give at least one example for each.

  Contrast elasticity of demand, cross-price elasticity

Contrast Elasticity of demand, Cross-price elasticity (include substitutes and complements), and Income elasticity (include normal and inferior goods).

  Explain how knowledge of the evaluator

Explain how knowledge of the evaluator (future employer) should influence a person’s writing of the resume or cover letter.

  Laziness or lack of critical thinking skills

Give an explanation of whether you believe that people employ logical fallacies due to laziness or lack of critical thinking skills.

  How to infer what kind of volcano erupted in given area

How could you infer what kind of volcano erupted in given area based on kind of volcanic deposits now found as layers of rock?

  Canadian code of ethics for psychologists

Which Decision Making Model Do YOU prefer? Choose one: The model outlined in Bersoff's commentary on p.146 - 147, OR the Ethical Decision Making Process as outlined in the Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd