Criteria - The assignment will be assessed out of 100 marks using the following criteria. The marks awarded would be then scaled to 70. You will have demonstrated ability to: Work Proposal. (Must be submitted on or before 21st . (10 marks) Identify and evaluate a suitable business case for a project. (10 marks) KPI of Project deliverables. (05 Marks) Recommend a strategy for reduction of uncertainties and the management of associated risk. (10 marks) Identify and apply appropriate planning and management tools for the project (20 marks) Recommend a suitable structure and process for the monitoring and control of a project (20 marks) Demonstrate visual method for displaying project Status (10 Marks) Formulate of strategy for the implementation of change, critical evaluation, reflection of industry guest lecture and references (15 marks). The assignment evaluation sheet is attached at the end of this document for your reference.

Assessment criteria: The following criteria will be interpreted appropriately according to the nature of the assessment and the general framework set by the module aim and learning outcomes. For a mark of above 69% - Show a thorough understanding of the purpose of the activity. Display knowledge of the major principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved in Project Management and an ability to apply them effectively. Provide evidence of wide reading, including academic journals. Demonstrate an ability to select critical points, evaluate them and communicate the conclusions effectively. Provide approaches that are creative, practicable, and supported. Provide a sound, supported critique of your own work. Provided sound and supported discussions of further research that may be needed.

For a mark of 60-69% - Show a clear understanding of the activity. Display knowledge of most of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved in Project Management and an ability to apply them effectively. Provide evidence of wide reading. Demonstrate an ability to select critical points and analyse them and draw sound conclusions. Provide approaches that are creative and practicable. Provide a supported critique of your own work. Provide supported, discussions of further research that may be needed.

For a mark of 50-59% - Show an adequate understanding of the activity. Display knowledge of some of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved in Project Management and an ability to apply them. Provide evidence of some reading related to the proposal. Demonstrate an ability to select key points in the exercise and analyse them. Provide approaches that are less creative or might not be entirely practicable. Provide a critique of your own work. Provide discussions of further research that may be needed.

For a mark of 40-49% - Show a barely adequate understanding of the purpose of the exercise. Display knowledge of some of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved in Project Management and attempt to apply them. Provide evidence of reading limited relevant literature. Attempt some analysis and discussion. Show some ability to link theory to problems and provide solutions. For a mark of 25-39% - Made an attempt to complete the exercise. Show little or no understanding of the principles, theories, and practices involved in Project Management. No evidence of academic reading. An inability to recognize the key points. For a mark of below 25% - Work lacks any academic merit as adjudged by the foregoing.

Note - Soft copy of the final document after plagiarism check must be uploaded through Moodle, on and before 26th. Ethical form must be uploaded along with your report. Presentation is mandatory for awarding marks and will be conducted only after submission. If absent for presentation, zero marks will be awarded. Submission links will be opened from 15th. Presentation will be commenced from 30th and must be completed on or before 31st. Please discuss with your faculty for finalizing presentation schedules.