Reference no: EM131184999
Determining Systems Requirements Although the customer loyalty project at Petrie’s Electronics had gone slowly at first, the past few weeks had been fast paced and busy, Jim Watanabe, the project manager, thought to himself. He had spent much of his time planning and conducting interviews with key stakeholders inside the company. He had also worked with the marketing group to put together some focus groups made up of loyal customers, to get some ideas about what they would value in a customer loyalty program. Jim had also spent some time studying customer loyalty programs at other big retail chains and those in other industries as well, such as the airlines, known for their extensive customer loyalty programs. As project manager, he had also supervised the efforts of his team members. Together, they had collected a great deal of data. Jim had just finished creating a high-level summary of the information into a table he could send to his team members
(PE Table 5-1). PE TABLE 5-1: Requirements and Constraints for Petrie’s Customer Loyalty Project Requirements • Effective customer incentives—System should be able to effectively store customer activity and convert to rewards and other incentives • Easy for customers to use—Interface should be intuitive for customer use • Proven performance—System as proposed should have been used successfully by other clients • Easy to implement—Implementation should not require outside consultants or extraordinary skills on the part of our staff or require specialized hardware • Scalable—System should be easily expandable as the number of participating customers grows • Vendor support—Vendor should have proven track record of reliable support and infrastructure in place to provide it Constraints • Cost to buy—Licenses for one year should be under $500,000 • Cost to operate—Total operating costs should be no more than $1 million per year • Time to implement—Duration of implementation should not exceed three months • Staff to implement—Implementation should be successful with the staff we have and with the skills they already possess From the list of requirements, it was clear that he and his team did not favor building a system from scratch in-house. Jim was glad that the team felt that way. Not only was building a system like this in-house an antiquated practice, it was expensive and time consuming. As nice as it might have been to develop a unique system just for Petrie’s, there was little point in reinventing the wheel. The IT staff would customize the system interface, and there would be lots of work for Sanjay’s staff in integrating the new system and its related components with Petrie’s existing systems, but the core of the system would have already been developed by someone else.
PE TABLE 5-2: Alternatives for Petrie’s Customer Loyalty Project
Alternative A
Data warehousing-centered system designed and licensed by Standard Basic Systems, Inc. (SBSI). The data warehousing tools at the heart of the system were designed and developed by SBSI, and work with standard relational DBMSs and relational/OO hybrid DBMSs. The SBSI tools and approach have been used for many years and are well known in the industry, but SBSI- certified staff are essential for implementation, operation, and maintenance. The license is relatively expensive. The customer loyalty application using the SBSI data warehousing tools is an established application, used by many retail businesses in other industries.
Alternative B
Customer relationship management (CRM)-centered system designed and licensed by XRA Corporation. XRA is a pioneer in CRM systems, so its CRM is widely recognized as an industry leader. The system includes tools that support customer loyalty programs. The CRM system itself is large and complex, but pricing in this proposal is based only on modules used for the customer loyalty application.
Alternative C
Proprietary system designed and licensed by Nova Innovation Group, Inc. The system is relatively new and leading edge, so it has only been implemented in a few sites. The vendor is truly innovative but small and inexperienced. The customer interface, designed for a standard Web browser, is stunning in its design and is extremely easy for customers to use to check on their loyalty program status. The software runs remotely, in the “cloud,” and data related to the customer loyalty program would be stored in the cloud too.
Just as he was finishing the e-mail he would send to his team about the new system’s requirements and constraints, he received a new message from Sanjay. He had asked Sanjay to take the lead in scouting out existing customer loyalty systems that Petrie’s could license. Sanjay had conducted a preliminary investigation that was now complete. His e-mail contained the descriptions of three of the systems he had found and studied (PE Table 5-2). Obviously, Jim and his team would need to have a lot more information about these alternatives, but Jim was intrigued by the possibilities. He sent a reply to Sanjay, asking him to pass the alternatives on to the team, and also asking him to prepare a briefing for the team that would include more detailed information about each alternative.
Case Questions
1. What do you think are the sources of the information Jim and his team collected? How do you think they collected all of that information?
2. If you were looking for alternative approaches for Petrie’s customer loyalty program, where would you look for information? Where would you start? How would you know when you were done?
3. Why shouldn’t Petrie’s staff build their own unique system in-house?
Considering two financial plans for the coming year
: Quigley Inc. is considering two financial plans for the coming year. Management expects sales to be $300,000, operating costs to be $265,000, assets to be $200,000, and its tax rate to be 35%. Under Plan A it would use 25% debt and 75% common equity...
|
Evaluate generation project with the cash flows
: Howell Petroleum, Inc., is trying to evaluate a generation project with the following cash flows: Year Cash Flow 0 –$44,000,000 1 69,500,000 2 –19,000,000 Required: If the company requires a 9 percent return on its investments, what is the NPV of the..
|
Calculate the MIRR of the project using all three methods
: Chamberlain Corp. is evaluating a project with the following cash flows. The company uses a discount rate of 10 percent and a reinvestment rate of 7 percent on all of its projects. Year Cash Flow 0 –$ 15,400 1 6,500 2 7,700 3 7,300 4 6,100 5 – 3,500 ..
|
What will be the net change in the cash conversion cycle
: Van Den Borsh Corp. has annual sales of $71,735,000, an average inventory level of $15,012,000, and average accounts receivable of $10,008,000. The firm's cost of goods sold is 85% of sales. The company makes all purchases on credit and has always pa..
|
Determining systems requirements-customer loyalty project
: Determining Systems Requirements Although the customer loyalty project at Petrie’s Electronics had gone slowly at first, the past few weeks had been fast paced and busy, Jim Watanabe, the project manager, thought to himself. What do you think are the..
|
Calculate the effective annual rates for each loan
: Jasmine Scents has been given two competing offers for short-term financing. Both offers are for borrowing $15,000 for 1 year. The first offer is a discount loan at 8%; the second offer is for interst to be paid at a maturity at a stated interest rat..
|
What will be the standard deviation and the rate of return
: A bank will allow you to borrow -- at 8% -- up to the amount of your own money that you commit to the project (i.e., if you invest, say $10 of your own money, you can borrow another $10 to do the same). What will be the standard deviation and the rat..
|
Portfolio allocates equal funds
: Your portfolio allocates equal funds to the DW Co, and woodpecker, inc, DW Co, stock has an annual return mean and standard deviation of 10 percent and 33 percent, respectively. The return correlation between DW Co. and Woodpecker, inc., is zero. Wha..
|
What would be the depreciation amount
: In January 2010, Salem Corporation, purchased $350,000 of new MACRS 5-year property in the US. This equipment was placed in service May 1, 2010. Salem wants to take as much depreciation in 2010 as possible. Calculate the depreciation for 2010. If Sal..
|