Reference no: EM13831969

Task: Research Report- Mini Research Project

Objectives

This assignment can be conducted in groups of 1, 2 or 3. If you wish to work in a group please let me know who your group members are as soon as possible.

The purpose of this assessment is to enable students to demonstrate a critical awareness of previous research in an IT context within a chosen topic area through a basic understanding of research theory and techniques. It requires clear communication of ideas in a professional manner so that the reader can easily understand the purpose and results of your research. Overall goals of this assignment are to help you to:

• Become more knowledgeable about finding and using varied research sources in your chosen area in IT.

• Further develop your critical thinking skills and back up your points with evidence.

• Become more adept at synthesizing information and developing informed views.

• Discipline yourself to follow a scholarly research format to document in-text sources and a references page (bibliography).

• Compose a well-organized, clear, concise, research paper to expand your knowledge on a research question in your chosen area.

Background

The mini research report provides a detailed description of a proposed research idea. It is similar to an essay and needs to be in a formal style with introduction, body and conclusion. In addition it requires a critical analysis and a coherent presentation.

Requirements

Each group is required submit a mini research report (4000-4500 words excluding the title, abstract, TOC and references/bibliography). The purpose of this task is to assist students to prepare and write a scholarly paper at an appropriate standard for this level of study.
You have already done quite a bit of work for this research: you should have a tentative research issue, strategies and evidence to persuade your readers about the significance of the problem you're researching, as well as the validity of your research issues. You also should consider opposing views or good counter-arguments that you can address in order to help establish your credibility and enhance the relevance of your paper.

A. Report Layout

The mini research report must contain the following sections, submitted in the order as listed below-

• Title Page - selection of an informative title

• Abstract - summarization of the significant concepts in the study focusing on key aspects (major results and conclusions)

• Introduction - Outline of the thesis, problem, question, etc. (stating the thesis/theory in terms of relationship among variables and examining the problem or investigating the question, or the like) and preview of the structure of the paper.

• Literature Review- demonstration of the ability to find significant sources, familiarity with the existing body of knowledge, analysis of existing research, and learning through a careful reading of existing scholarship.

• Methods (and Methodology)- procedures and processes undertaken in your investigation/study including the research design- study type, research question, hypotheses, variables, and data collection methods (as applicable).

o For research methods that may include a human ethics submission, i.e. surveys, interviews, questionnaires, tests etc. please refer to: https://federation.edu.au/research/research-support/ethics/human-ethics/human-ethics3

A review of the human ethics documents, including a check list and ethics submissions should be investigated. A description of the procedure that would need to be undertaken should be included in this section. (The human Ethics documents can be found in the above link, or in the Moodle "Research Report Assessment" section within the resources folder.)

• Results (and Findings) - presenting your evidence and developing your argument. If appropriate, you analyze your data, outline your evidence, and apply your research design.

• Discussion (Analysis & Substantiation )- match up with the aims/goals/argument of the research question/s, bring together the major outcomes of your project, interpret and review all significant findings, notes and discuss all shortcomings.

• Conclusion - briefly restate the research highlighting the implications of your findings

• References- include relevant literature sources (in-text citation and a list of full-text references)

• Appendices (if applicable) - tables, graphs, charts or any other- related to the study not included in the main paper but referred to.

Note: Students are required to follow the ‘General guide to referencing' and ‘Guide to Writing and Study Skills'- specially the ‘Layout and Appearance' and the ‘Report' sections.

https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/164121/FedUni-General-Guide-to-Referencing-2014.pdf

https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/190044/2014-General-Guide-to-Writing-and-Study-Skills.pdf

B. Reflective Journal

You are required to produce a Reflective Journal (approximately 1000 words) that has been ongoing and progressive in terms of reporting ideas developed and other findings for the purposes of the research work.

For this part of the assignment, write up a Reflective Journal of all work relating to your research topic and research idea as you have progressed through on a weekly basis, based on your weekly work/exercises in Part B of your Tutorial-Workshops from weeks 1-10.

• A Reflective Journal is a tool that allows students to reflect on and write about their progress in their learning. They can identify and reflect on success and challenges. Its purpose is:

o To record the development of your ideas and insights through the weekly exercises

o To reflect on your own learning process

o To analyze and discuss key issues covered by class work and/or readings

• In other words, a Reflective Journal is a personal record of your progress and your developments in thinking about a subject or a topic. Although it's a more informal style of writing than other academic assignments, you now need to submit it as regular entries developed over a period of time- from week 1 till week 10. Your reflective journal forms the basis of your research report.

• Consider the following when writing a reflective journal:

o Describe events and your experience on weekly basis (weeks 1-10 based on the Tutorial-Workshops Part B) - What did I do/hear/see?

o Interpret and evaluate the events from your perspective - What do I think about it now? How does it relate to other things that I know?

o Explain your experience- reveal your new insights, connections with other learning, your hypotheses, and your conclusions.

o Have I changed how I think about the situation? How have I used these to help organize my writing?

• Create individual weekly headings to reflect on and add a brief conclusion on the reflections at the end, all as suggested above.

[Adapted from the following sources: Morley-Warner, T. (2000), Academic writing is: A guide to writing in a university context, Centre for Research and Education in the Arts, Sydney.]

** VERY IMPORTANT NOTE **

It is optional that you remain in your group.

As you have already worked with the members of your group in the research proposal, it is now up to you to decide if you should remain with these group members before starting this assignment. If you do remain with your group members for this assignment, then you do so under the condition that any problems that are under your control remain your problems as a group. Therefore, if any group members do not contribute equally, or you have problems completing this assignment, for reasons other than set out in the special consideration guidelines, then all group members will receive the same mark and may fail.

Please consider this thoughtfully, and if you have any doubts that your group may have problems completing the assignment, or you have concerns that some members may not contribute equally, then please discuss this with your lecturer before commencing this assignment in your current group.

Please refer to the following link for special consideration:

https://policy.federation.edu.au/student_services_and_administration/enrolment/special_consideration/ch01.php

Submission

Research Report- Marking Rubric

Student Id. Student Name

Category Excellent Good Acceptable Poor/Unacceptable Marks

Introduction 4-5

Strong introduction of topic's key question(s) and terms. Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. Specific thesis statement.

Conveys topic and key question(s). Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. General thesis statement.

Conveys topic, but not key question(s). Describes subtopics to be reviewed. General thesis statement.

Does not adequately convey topic. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Lacks adequate thesis statement.

Literature Review

Sources are exceptionally well-integrated and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively.

Sources are well integrated and support the paper's claims.

Sources support some claims made in the paper, but might not be integrated well within the paper's argument.

The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well.

Methods (and Methodology)

Appropriate procedures and processes included and clear design of the research addressed.

Procedures and processes are included, and research design is somewhat clear.

Some procedures and processes included, and research design is not clear.

Procedures and processes are absent or vague, and research design is not addressed or very poorly addressed.

Results (and Findings)

All data (results) is recorded and organized in a clear manner. All visible observations are provided. Complete and correct analysis of data is provided.

All data (results) is recorded and organized in somewhat clear manner. All visible observations are provided. Analysis of data is provided with a few errors.

All data (results) is recorded, not organized. Visible observations are not clear. Analysis of data with some errors.

Data (results) not provided or vaguely provided. Visible observations and analysis of data are missing.

Discussion (Analysis & Substantiation)

Exceptionally well-presented and argued. Ideas are detailed, well-developed, supported with specific evidence and facts, as well as in-depth analysis.

Well-presented and argued. Ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific, displays evidence of basic analysis.

Content is sound. Ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence of analysis, but usually of a generalized nature.

Content is presented but not sound, and analysis is vague or not evident.

Conclusion

The conclusion is engaging and strong integration with the thesis statement.

The conclusion restates the thesis.

The conclusion does not adequately restate the thesis.

Incomplete and/or unfocused. Does not summarize evidence with respect to thesis.

Overall Organization

Well-planned, logically-flowing and well-thought out. Includes informative title, an abstract that summarizes key aspects and an appropriate TOC.

Good overall organization and somewhat logically-flowing. Includes title, abstract with some key aspects and a TOC.

There is a sense of organization. Includes title, abstract with few key aspects and a TOC.

No/lack of sense of organization. Missing title and/or a TOC. Also missing abstract or includes abstract that is vague.

Grammar & Mechanics

Excellent grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation.

A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation, but not many.

Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax and/or punctuation- a sign of lack of proof-reading.

Continuous errors

References and Formatting

Includes range of legitimate references (internet, articles, quotations, books and journals etc.). Correct use of referencing and citation using APA style. Used University Guide for layout and appearance.

Few errors in references or citations and also in layout and appearance.

Some errors in references or citations and also in layout and appearance.

Many errors in references or citations and also in layout and appearance.

Scaled

Comments (if any):

Marked by:

Reflective Journal- Rubric

Student Id. Student Name

Reflection of learning

Shows great depth of knowledge and learning, reveals understanding and thoughts. Abstract ideas reflected through use of specific details. Relates learning with research and project, personal and general reflections included. Does not go deeply into the reflection of learning. Generalizations and limited insight and uses some detail. Little or no explanation or reflection on learning. No details to support reflection or few details that do not reflect thoughtful consideration or important aspects of own experiences of the research.

Structural

development of

the Ideas

Demonstrates logical and subtle sequencing of ideas and insights by connecting the student's experiences to the research work. Transitions are used to enhance organization. Ideas and insights present but not perfected. Demonstrates some understanding of course material, but does not clearly connect the student's research experiences. Lack of or no development of ideas and insights. No evidence of structure or organization.

Mechanics and Usage No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling as well as sentence structure and word usage. Some errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling as well as in sentence structure and word usage. Numerous and distracting errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling as well as in sentence structure and word usage.

Content All entries are provided containing complete answers to all questions prompts. Entry provides answers to most question prompts for all entries, missing some. Entry significantly misses key question prompts or does not answer important questions and also missing some entries.

Conclusion The conclusion is engaging and restates personal learning. The conclusion does not adequately restate the learning. Missing, incomplete and/or unfocused.