+1-415-670-9189
info@expertsmind.com
Brief the facts of the case - inc. v. soskin
Course:- Business Management
Reference No.:- EM13839753




Assignment Help
Assignment Help >> Business Management

Read the Call-of-the-Question carefully, and follow the instructions for each subject. Prepare four Briefing Papers using the APA Format for Research Papers.

Briefing Paper 1: Critical Legal Thinking Instructions: Read Bank of America, N. A. v. Barr - Cheeseman text page 293-294

Respond to the three Case Questions found in Cheeseman Text page 294 Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted in the Critical Legal Thinking, Ethics, and Contemporary Business questions. Argue both sides of all issues.

Briefing Paper 2: Law Case with Answers Instructions: Read Creative Resource Management, Inc. v. Soskin - Cheeseman text page 324 Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions the effects of Mr. Soskin''s signature and what other facts could make him personally liable for the debt of the LLC. Argue both sides of the issue.

Briefing Paper 3: Critical Legal Thinking Cases Instructions: Read Sections 14.5 Liability of General Partners - (p. 307); 15.6 Liability of Members - (p. 326); 14.6 Liability of Limited Partners - (p. 307); and Limited Liability Company- (p. 325) Check the decisions of the highest appellate courts, if a case is cited, for each fact pattern.

Brief the facts of the cases and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on whether each of the four subjects affect business in the United States and if so, provide the worst and best case scenarios.

Briefing Paper 4: Ethics Case Instructions: Read Section 14.9 Ethics - Cheeseman text page 308 Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on the three questions found at the end of Section 11.9. Argue both sides of all issues.

Answered:-

Verified Expert


Preview Container content

Introduction:

The report will discuss in detail about various kind of businesses and its features like sole proprietorship and partnership. Various cases will be discussed in detail where these types of businesses and their attributes and exception will be discussed.

Case 1:

The case discusses in detail about the Bank of America vs. Barr where Constance Barr is the sole owner of the company called The Stone Scones. As a sole proprietor, Barr took some $100,000 loan for the operations. The Bank sends the letter of approval to both, Constance Barr and the Stone Scone treating it as a different legal entity. Later when Barr failed to repay the amount, the bank sued her and claimed the money.




Put your comment
 
Minimize


Ask Question & Get Answers from Experts
Browse some more (Business Management) Materials
Assume you are the owner of a small dental office with one dentist, five dental hygienists, a nurse, and three office assistants. Your employees must handle confidential pat
The main tools are Probability Analysis, Sensitivity Analysis, and Decision Tree Analysis. Discuss these tools one at a time. As you discuss these, bring in how you would di
When the formula is copied it may change depending on the type of cell reference displayed in the formula. Explain the difference between a relative cell reference and an ab
The union claims no commerce is involved and that federal law does not apply. Can the statute survive a constitutional challenge? Is there a "rational basis" for the statute
Rowe Price Group, Inc and subsidiaries (the company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Ine
What types of control criteria would you expect these companies (Panasonic and Procter & Gamble) to use in evaluating their operations and determining how well they are doin
We have probably all realized by now that the fresh water on Earth today is the same quantity that was here millions of years ago and that will be on Earth millions of years
Identify the weakness of this specific style of decision making. In my opinion, the weakness is the chance that data may not be efficient.