Benefits and limitations of audit
Course:- Auditing
Reference No.:- EM1354503

Assignment Help
Assignment Help >> Auditing

A fellow business student questions the benefits of an audit as follows:

"Why should a company hire auditors? As far as I can tell auditors of public companies charge millions of dollars in audit fees, and it is not clear to me that management receives any benefit for this expenditure. It is just money down the drain. It is also not clear to me that auditors accomplish anything. We have seen a number of material restatements of financial statements. Why should a company pay for audits that are ineffective? I think auditors are just a drain on society."

a. Explain the economic benefits provided by a financial statement audit.

b. Explain the inherent limitations that might prevent auditors from finding every potential material misstatement in financial statements.

Ask Question & Get Answers from Experts
Browse some more (Auditing) Materials
Identify the factors that would affect the preliminary assessment of inherent risk and control risk at queen island dairy and explain how these factors would influence your ch
A memo question will be assigned during lecture or tutorial and a written description of that question will be posted to the assignment section of Blackboard. A total of four
School District 25 formally integrates the budget into the accounting system and uses the encumbrance system. All appropriations lapse at year-end.
Define professional skepticism and discuss why it so important to the practice of auditing. Read the attached article, "A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skeptic
What are the expected rates of reimbursement for this time frame for each payer? What is your expected accounts receivable? What is the rate that you should charge for these s
Given the recent accounting scandals, how much confidence should the public really have in financial audits? mIn light of recent audit failures, are current audit standards s
Western Bank & Trust purchased land and a building for the lump sum of $3 million dollars. To get the maximum tax deduction, Western allocated 90% of the purchase price to t
Which of these two controls would cost less and prove more effective? Is there a different, more cost effective strategy we should consider?