+1-415-670-9189
info@expertsmind.com
Analyze the facts related to employment discrimination
Course:- Business Law and Ethics
Reference No.:- EM13993943




Assignment Help
Expertsmind Rated 4.9 / 5 based on 47215 reviews.
Review Site
Assignment Help >> Business Law and Ethics

Scenario

Mary Jane and Allen Greene, a married couple, owna high-end costume jewelry manufacturing and distribution company called Greene's Jewelry Wholesale, LLC.The principal place of business for Greene's Jewelry is in Derry, New Hampshire, where it owns a warehouse and two storefronts.

Originally started in 1957, the company expanded over five decades, and it now employs 502 individuals in a variety of departments, including sales and marketing, research and development, human resources, and manufacturing.

The primary asset of Greene's Jewelry is its patented process for creating a synthetic gold-colored material called "Ever-Gold," which is used in Greene's necklaces, rings, earrings, and bracelets. Ever-Gold is impervious to scratches, discoloration, oxidization, and is marketed as "everlasting gold."

Jennifer Lawson, who has beenemployed for three years as a junior executive secretaryin the research and development department at Greene's Jewelry, has just learned that she is pregnant. She has earned high marks on each of her annual reviews with the company, with the exception of the fact that she routinely shows up 15to 30minutes late for work. Otherwise, she is deemed to be professional, articulate, diligent, and skilled in her role with the company. When Lawson advises the head of human resources, Lisa Peele, that she may have to take additional time off as a result of some high-risk factors that she will face during the course of her pregnancy, she is told that her position has been eliminated. The specific words are:"Congratulations Jennifer! That is exciting news for you. We do not need to worry about time off, though, because, regrettably, I was just going to let you know that we are downsizing and no longer have a need for any of our junior executive secretaries."

Jennifer is distraught, and immediately returns to her desk to clear it out as instructed. She removes all of her personal items, as well as the projects she was working on prior to her discussion with Lisa Peele. When she returns toher home, she realizes that she has inadvertently taken a draft letter to Greene's patent attorney, which details the secret process for creating Ever-Gold.

Although Greene's Jewelry requires all of its executives to sign covenants not to compete and confidentiality agreements, Jennifer was only required to sign a confidentiality agreement, by which she agreed never to disclose any information that she might acquire from Greene's regarding the process used to create Ever-Gold.

Panicked, and knowing thatshe needs a job, she calls one of Greene's competitors, Howell Jewelry World,and advises itshiring manager that she is a former employee of Greene's, that she needs a job, and that she has confidential information about Ever-Gold that would help Howell compete with Greene's. The hiring manager at Howell, Naomi White, schedules an interview with Jennifer for the following day.

At the end of the interview, Naomi makes an offer to Jennifer to begin work with Howell immediately, but she conditions the offeron Jennifer's execution of an employment contract. The contract contains two specific provisions that Naomi insists Jennifer read and initial, in addition to signing the contract as a whole. One of those provisions states that Jennifer will disclose the information she has regarding the Ever-Gold process prior to commencing work with Howell. The other provision is a covenant to not work for any competitor of Howell for two years after she leaves the employ of Howell, irrespective of the reason for leaving,and whether she quits or is fired. Jennifer initials both of the provisions, signs the contract for employment, and gives Naomi acopy of the letter that she removed from her desk at Greene's.

One week after she starts working with Howell, Jennifer is fired for chronic tardiness, and she thereafter gets a job working as a sales associate with the only other jewelry company in town, Triumph Jewels.

Meanwhile, Greene's learns that Howell has acquired knowledge of the secret process used to create Ever-Gold, and that Howell has tweaked the process slightly so as to avoid any patent infringement issues but to still create a product with similar characteristics and qualities of Ever-Gold. Howell, for its part, has learned that Jennifer is working for a competitor and fears that Jennifer will disclose the process to Triumph. Finally, one of Howell's customers had developed a disfiguring rash as a direct result of the new process Howell has begun using in its jewelry.

Greene's sues Jennifer for breach of the confidentiality agreement when it learns that she has given confidential information to Howell. Jennifer counter-sues Greene's for wrongful termination. Howell sues Jennifer for breach of the covenant not to compete, and Jennifer counter-sues for fraudulent inducement, believing that she was tricked into signing the employment contract with Howell and that Howell was never interested in hiring her, but was interested only in acquiring information on the process to create Ever-Gold. Howell also sues Triumph, claiming that it knew or should have known that Jennifer was subject to a covenant not to compete, and that Triumph should therefore be bound by its provisions.

Specifically,the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Memo Introduction: Articulate what you feel are the strengths of your company's legal claim or defense.

II. Client's Case

A. Facts and Laws

1. Analyze the facts related to employment discrimination or unlawful termination based on your company's perspective.

2. Analyze the facts related to contract issues based on your company's perspective.

3. Identify the operative employment and contract laws that apply to your company's case.

B. Precedent

1. Select cases that support your company's position in terms of employment discrimination or unlawful termination. Justify why they support its case.

2. Select cases that support your company's position in terms of contract disputes. Justify why they support its case.

C. Facts to be Determined

1. Determine any facts that will help you better analyze your company's position. In other words, what questions do you need answered before you can proceed?

2. Explain how the identified facts will help establish the legal rights and/or obligations of the defendant in relation to your company. In other words, how would those facts reflect on the propriety and legality of the decisions that were made?




Put your comment
 
Minimize


Ask Question & Get Answers from Experts
Browse some more (Business Law and Ethics) Materials
Discuss the positive results associated with following the steps and the negative results associated with not following the steps. Provide a current example of an organizati
Identify three critical infrastructure assets in your local community and rank order them according to which one you consider to have the highest intrinsic value and the hig
Organizational culture is a shared pattern of beliefs, expectations, and meanings that influence the actions of the organization's members. What do you think constitutes a "
One disadvantage of a national health insurance system such as Canada's is "queuing"-people. - What elements of a national health insurance system could lead to this situation
Welcome to the Module 3 SLP! Again, you will be examining the jurisdiction you chose in the first module. Refer to the required and optional readings on the Miranda Law, the t
Prepare a 7-10 slide PPT presentation to present your personal criminology theory and apply your theory to analyze one case of crime that you are familiar with. Briefly desc
How does one know if someone is the authorized agent or another?  For instance, if I own a shop and have an employee in training who has specific instructions NOT to sell anyt
Jackie does not want a large board of directors to be formed. Jackie fears that the board would somehow detract from the family goals and orientation the business has alway